Rosuvastatin, also known as the brand name product Crestor, is a lipid-lowering drug that belongs to the statin class of medications, which are used to lower the risk of cardiovascular disease and manage elevated lipid levels by inhibiting the endogenous production of cholesterol in the liver. More specifically, statin medications competitively inhibit the enzyme hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) Reductase, which catalyzes the conversion of HMG-CoA to mevalonic acid and is the third step in a sequence of metabolic reactions involved in the production of several compounds involved in lipid metabolism and transport including cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (sometimes referred to as “bad cholesterol”), and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL). Prescribing of statin medications is considered standard practice following any cardiovascular events and for people with a moderate to high risk of development of CVD, such as those with Type 2 Diabetes. The clear evidence of the benefit of statin use coupled with very minimal side effects or long term effects has resulted in this class becoming one of the most widely prescribed medications in North America. Rosuvastatin and other drugs from the statin class of medications including [atorvastatin], [pravastatin], [simvastatin], [fluvastatin], and [lovastatin] are considered first-line options for the treatment of dyslipidemia. This is largely due to the fact that cardiovascular disease (CVD), which includes heart attack, atherosclerosis, angina, peripheral artery disease, and stroke, has become a leading cause of death in high-income countries and a major cause of morbidity around the world. Elevated cholesterol levels, and in particular, elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels, are an important risk factor for the development of CVD. Use of statins to target and reduce LDL levels has been shown in a number of landmark studies to significantly reduce the risk of development of CVD and all-cause mortality. Statins are considered a cost-effective treatment option for CVD due to their evidence of reducing all-cause mortality including fatal and non-fatal CVD as well as the need for surgical revascularization or angioplasty following a heart attack. Evidence has shown that even for low-risk individuals (with <10% risk of a major vascular event occurring within 5 years) statins cause a 20%-22% relative reduction in major cardiovascular events (heart attack, stroke, coronary revascularization, and coronary death) for every 1 mmol/L reduction in LDL without any significant side effects or risks. While all statin medications are considered equally effective from a clinical standpoint, rosuvastatin is considered the most potent; doses of 10 to 40mg rosuvastatin per day were found in clinical studies to result in a 45.8% to 54.6% decreases in LDL cholesterol levels, which is about three-fold more potent than [atorvastatin]’s effects on LDL cholesterol. However, the results of the SATURN trial concluded that despite this difference in potency, there was no difference in their effect on the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Rosuvastatin is also a unique member of the class of statins due to its high hydrophilicity which increases hepatic uptake at the site of action, low bioavailability, and minimal metabolism via the Cytochrome P450 system. This last point results in less risk of drug-drug interactions compared to [atorvastatin], [lovastatin], and [simvastatin], which are all extensively metabolized by Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, an enzyme involved in the metabolism of many commonly used drugs. Drugs such as [ciclosporin], [gemfibrozil], and some antiretrovirals are more likely to interact with this statin through antagonism of OATP1B1 organic anion transporter protein 1B1-mediated hepatic uptake of rosuvastatin.
Science-backed ERA derivation by certified toxicologists with ex-agency experts -
Rosuvastatin
Drug Overview
What is Rosuvastatin?
Masuu Global provides end-to-end Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) support for pharmaceutical and healthcare products, covering Phase I environmental exposure assessment, Phase II environmental fate and effects assessment, data-gap analysis, testing strategy, laboratory coordination and final regulatory-ready reporting.
Request Your Assessment
Add this compound to your inquiry list and our team will follow up with full documentation, pricing, and licensing terms.
View Inquiry List →ERA Phase I Evaluation, ERA Phase II Evaluation, Consortium Testing Support (OECD Ecotoxicology Study)
Regulatory Framework
Assessment Methodology
Masuu Global follows a science-based, tiered and risk-based ERA methodology, aligned with applicable international regulatory requirements. For human medicinal products, our approach is primarily guided by the EMA Guideline EMEA/CHMP/SWP/4447/00 Rev. 1, effective 1 September 2024, together with relevant OECD Test Guidelines and regional regulatory requirements.
EMA — Environmental Risk Assessment
Assessment of potential environmental exposure associated with the use, manufacture and disposal of medicinal products, with a structured approach to determine whether further environmental assessment is required.
Phase I — Environmental Exposure Assessment
Initial screening to determine potential environmental exposure, covering PEC calculation, physicochemical properties, usage and dosage data, environmental entry pathways, and persistence and fate considerations.
Phase II — Environmental Fate & Effects Assessment
Where Phase I indicates further assessment is required, Phase II provides detailed evaluation of environmental fate, persistence and ecological effects — including biodegradation, bioaccumulation, aquatic toxicity, PNEC derivation and PEC/PNEC risk characterisation.
OECD & International Testing Principles
Where laboratory studies are required, testing strategies are designed with consideration of relevant OECD Test Guidelines, GLP expectations and applicable regulatory requirements.
Risk-Based Environmental Assessment
Integration of physicochemical data, environmental fate information, ecotoxicological data, existing literature, published studies, regulatory databases, usage data, and environmental monitoring data.
Weight-of-Evidence (WoE) Approach
A scientifically justified WoE approach integrates existing data and avoids unnecessary testing wherever scientifically and regulatorily justified.
ERA Assessment Pathway
Phase I → Phase II → Risk Characterization
Each phase builds on the prior tier — screening first, escalating only when the evidence demands it.
Environmental Exposure Assessment
Initial screening to determine whether the substance requires progression to Phase II.
- Product and substance information review
- Indication, dose and usage assessment
- PEC calculation and environmental exposure estimation
- Physicochemical property review
- Initial environmental risk screening
- Determination of Phase II requirement
Environmental Fate & Effects
Detailed evaluation when Phase I triggers further assessment.
- Biodegradation, hydrolysis & photolysis
- Adsorption/desorption behaviour
- Bioaccumulation potential
- Algal, Daphnia and fish toxicity
- Chronic ecotoxicity, where required
- PEC/PNEC risk characterisation
Laboratory Coordination & Study Execution
When regulatory testing is mandatory, Masuu coordinates with qualified GLP/appropriate testing laboratories and specialized scientific partners — giving clients a single point of contact across the full testing lifecycle.
Final ERA Report — Contents
- Executive summary
- Substance & product information
- Environmental exposure assessment
- Phase I evaluation
- Phase II assessment (where applicable)
- Environmental fate assessment
- Ecotoxicological assessment
- PEC/PNEC calculations
- Risk characterisation
- Data gap evaluation
- Testing rationale
- Risk mitigation considerations
- References and supporting scientific evidence
How We Work
Report Preparation Process
Every ERA follows a structured, tiered workflow designed to deliver scientifically defensible and regulator-ready assessments.
Comprehensive Data Collection
Product, substance, usage, physicochemical, toxicological, environmental and regulatory information collected and reviewed.
Phase I Environmental Screening
Environmental exposure assessment and determination of whether the assessment can conclude at Phase I or requires progression.
Phase II Evaluation
Detailed environmental fate and ecotoxicological assessment when Phase II is triggered.
Data Gap & Testing Strategy
Missing information identified and available alternatives evaluated before recommending additional testing.
Consortium Testing Support
Where testing is mandatory, Masuu coordinates with qualified testing partners through its Consortium Model.
Scientific & Regulatory Review
Integration and critical review of generated and existing data by experienced scientific and regulatory experts.
Final ERA Delivery
Comprehensive ERA report with transparent methodology, scientific rationale, calculations, conclusions and regulatory recommendations.
Ex-Agency Advantage
Why Masuu Global?
Our experienced regulatory and scientific experts bring a practical regulatory perspective — helping clients understand not only what data are required, but why they are required and how regulators may evaluate them.
Ready to request your assessment?
Add this compound to your inquiry list, or browse our full database of 7,000+ molecules.