Toxicology Report

Science-backed ERA derivation by certified toxicologists with ex-agency experts -

Olmesartan

What is Olmesartan?

CAS No: 144689-24-7

Olmesartan belongs to the angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) family of drugs, which also includes [telmisartan], [candesartan], [losartan], [valsartan], and [irbesartan]. ARBs selectively bind to angiotensin receptor 1 (AT1) and prevent the protein angiotensin II from binding and exerting its hypertensive effects, which include vasoconstriction, stimulation and synthesis of aldosterone and ADH, cardiac stimulation, and renal reabsorption of sodium, among others. Overall, olmesartan’s physiologic effects lead to reduced blood pressure, lower aldosterone levels, reduced cardiac activity, and increased excretion of sodium. Olmesartan also affects the renin-angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS), which plays an important role in hemostasis and regulation of kidney, vascular, and cardiac functions. Pharmacological blockade of RAAS via AT1 receptor blockade inhibits negative regulatory feedback within RAAS, which is a contributing factor to the pathogenesis and progression of cardiovascular disease, heart failure, and renal disease. In particular, heart failure is associated with chronic activation of RAAS, leading to inappropriate fluid retention, vasoconstriction, and ultimately a further decline in left ventricular function. ARBs have been shown to have a protective effect on the heart by improving cardiac function, reducing afterload, increasing cardiac output and preventing ventricular hypertrophy and remodelling. By comparison, the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) class of medications (which includes drugs such as [ramipril], [lisinopril], and [perindopril]) inhibit the conversion of angiotensin I to angiotensin II through inhibition of the ACE enzyme. However, this does not prevent the formation of all angiotensin II within the body. The angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) family of drugs unique in that it blocks all angiotensin II activity, regardless of where or how it was synthesized. Olmesartan is commonly used for the management of hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes-associated nephropathy, particularly in patients who are unable to tolerate ACE inhibitors. ARBs such as olmesartan have been shown in a number of large-scale clinical outcomes trials to improve cardiovascular outcomes including reducing risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, the progression of heart failure, and hospitalization. Like other ARBs, olmesartan blockade of RAAS slows the progression of diabetic nephropathy due to its renoprotective effects. Orally available olmesartan is produced as the prodrug olmesartan medoxomil which is rapidly converted in vivo to the pharmacologically active olmesartan. It was developed by Daiichi Sankyo Pharmaceuticals and approved in 2002.

Masuu Global provides end-to-end Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) support for pharmaceutical and healthcare products, covering Phase I environmental exposure assessment, Phase II environmental fate and effects assessment, data-gap analysis, testing strategy, laboratory coordination and final regulatory-ready reporting.

Request Your Assessment

Add this compound to your inquiry list and our team will follow up with full documentation, pricing, and licensing terms.

View Inquiry List →
What's included:
ERA Phase I Evaluation, ERA Phase II Evaluation, Consortium Testing Support (OECD Ecotoxicology Study)
1,500+
Environmental & Regulatory
Risk Assessments Supported
70+
Subject Matter Experts
across global operations
12
In-House Ex-Agency
Regulatory & Scientific Experts
3
Expert Credentials:
ERT · UKRT · DABT

Assessment Methodology

Masuu Global follows a science-based, tiered and risk-based ERA methodology, aligned with applicable international regulatory requirements. For human medicinal products, our approach is primarily guided by the EMA Guideline EMEA/CHMP/SWP/4447/00 Rev. 1, effective 1 September 2024, together with relevant OECD Test Guidelines and regional regulatory requirements.

EMA
ERA

EMA — Environmental Risk Assessment

Assessment of potential environmental exposure associated with the use, manufacture and disposal of medicinal products, with a structured approach to determine whether further environmental assessment is required.

Phase
I

Phase I — Environmental Exposure Assessment

Initial screening to determine potential environmental exposure, covering PEC calculation, physicochemical properties, usage and dosage data, environmental entry pathways, and persistence and fate considerations.

Phase
II

Phase II — Environmental Fate & Effects Assessment

Where Phase I indicates further assessment is required, Phase II provides detailed evaluation of environmental fate, persistence and ecological effects — including biodegradation, bioaccumulation, aquatic toxicity, PNEC derivation and PEC/PNEC risk characterisation.

OECD
GLP

OECD & International Testing Principles

Where laboratory studies are required, testing strategies are designed with consideration of relevant OECD Test Guidelines, GLP expectations and applicable regulatory requirements.

Risk
Env

Risk-Based Environmental Assessment

Integration of physicochemical data, environmental fate information, ecotoxicological data, existing literature, published studies, regulatory databases, usage data, and environmental monitoring data.

WoE

Weight-of-Evidence (WoE) Approach

A scientifically justified WoE approach integrates existing data and avoids unnecessary testing wherever scientifically and regulatorily justified.

Phase I → Phase II → Risk Characterization

Each phase builds on the prior tier — screening first, escalating only when the evidence demands it.

Phase I Screening

Environmental Exposure Assessment

Initial screening to determine whether the substance requires progression to Phase II.

  • Product and substance information review
  • Indication, dose and usage assessment
  • PEC calculation and environmental exposure estimation
  • Physicochemical property review
  • Initial environmental risk screening
  • Determination of Phase II requirement
Phase II Evaluation

Environmental Fate & Effects

Detailed evaluation when Phase I triggers further assessment.

  • Biodegradation, hydrolysis & photolysis
  • Adsorption/desorption behaviour
  • Bioaccumulation potential
  • Algal, Daphnia and fish toxicity
  • Chronic ecotoxicity, where required
  • PEC/PNEC risk characterisation
Consortium Testing Model

Laboratory Coordination & Study Execution

When regulatory testing is mandatory, Masuu coordinates with qualified GLP/appropriate testing laboratories and specialized scientific partners — giving clients a single point of contact across the full testing lifecycle.

Study Selection Protocol Development Lab Coordination Sample Management Study Execution Data Review Regulatory Interpretation ERA Integration

Final ERA Report — Contents

  • Executive summary
  • Substance & product information
  • Environmental exposure assessment
  • Phase I evaluation
  • Phase II assessment (where applicable)
  • Environmental fate assessment
  • Ecotoxicological assessment
  • PEC/PNEC calculations
  • Risk characterisation
  • Data gap evaluation
  • Testing rationale
  • Risk mitigation considerations
  • References and supporting scientific evidence

Report Preparation Process

Every ERA follows a structured, tiered workflow designed to deliver scientifically defensible and regulator-ready assessments.

01

Comprehensive Data Collection

Product, substance, usage, physicochemical, toxicological, environmental and regulatory information collected and reviewed.

02

Phase I Environmental Screening

Environmental exposure assessment and determination of whether the assessment can conclude at Phase I or requires progression.

03

Phase II Evaluation

Detailed environmental fate and ecotoxicological assessment when Phase II is triggered.

04

Data Gap & Testing Strategy

Missing information identified and available alternatives evaluated before recommending additional testing.

05

Consortium Testing Support

Where testing is mandatory, Masuu coordinates with qualified testing partners through its Consortium Model.

06

Scientific & Regulatory Review

Integration and critical review of generated and existing data by experienced scientific and regulatory experts.

07

Final ERA Delivery

Comprehensive ERA report with transparent methodology, scientific rationale, calculations, conclusions and regulatory recommendations.

Why Masuu Global?

Our experienced regulatory and scientific experts bring a practical regulatory perspective — helping clients understand not only what data are required, but why they are required and how regulators may evaluate them.

Regulatory expectation-driven assessmentsAligned with applicable global ERA requirements.
Tiered assessment strategyPhase I screening followed by Phase II only when scientifically and regulatorily justified.
Data gap optimisationLiterature, databases, read-across and in-silico information evaluated before recommending new testing.
Consortium testing coordinationManaged laboratory engagement when mandatory studies are required.
Integrated scientific interpretationEnvironmental fate, ecotoxicity and risk characterisation connected into one coherent assessment.
Regulatory-ready documentationDesigned to support submissions, authority queries and technical reviews.
Reduced testing burdenStructured data-gap and weight-of-evidence approach minimises unnecessary study requirements.
Single-point coordinationAssessment, testing strategy, laboratory engagement and final ERA integration — one team.
Global regulatory supportERA services spanning pharmaceutical and healthcare products across multiple markets.

Ready to request your assessment?

Add this compound to your inquiry list, or browse our full database of 7,000+ molecules.

Book a Demo