Ledipasvir is a direct acting antiviral (DAA) medication used as part of combination therapy to treat chronic Hepatitis C, an infectious liver disease caused by infection with Hepatitis C Virus (HCV). HCV is a single-stranded RNA virus that is categorized into nine distinct genotypes, with genotype 1 being the most common in the United States, and affecting 72% of all chronic HCV patients. Treatment options for chronic Hepatitis C have advanced significantly since 2011, with the development of Direct Acting Antivirals (DAAs) such as ledipasvir. More specifically, ledipasvir is an inhibitor of the Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Non-Structural Protein 5A (NS5A), which is required for viral RNA replication and assembly of HCV virions. Although its exact mechanism of action is unknown, it is postulated to prevent hyperphosphorylation of NS5A which is required for viral protein production. It is effective against genotypes 1a, 1b, 4a, and 5a and with a lesser activity against genotypes 2a and 3a of HCV. Ledipasvir and other direct acting antivirals are very potent options for the treatment of Hepatitis C, as they exhibit a high barrier to the development of resistance. This is an important advantage relative to HCV drugs that target other viral enzymes such as the protease, for which rapid development of resistance has proven to be an important cause of therapeutic failure. In a joint recommendation published in 2016, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) recommend ledipasvir as a first line therapy option in combination with [sofosbuvir] for the treatment of HCV genotypes 1a, 1b, 4, 5, and 6. Treatment with ledipasvir is used with the intent to cure, or achieve a sustained virologic response (SVR), after 12 weeks of daily therapy. SVR and eradication of HCV infection is associated with significant long-term health benefits including reduced liver-related damage, improved quality of life, reduced incidence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, and reduced all-cause mortality. Treatment with direct acting antivirals such as ledipasvir is associated with very minimal side effects, with the most common being headache and fatigue. Lack of significant side effects and short duration of therapy is a considerable advantage over older interferon- and ribavirin-based regimens, which were limited by infusion site reactions, reduced blood count, and neuropsychiatric effects. Since 2014, ledipasvir has been available as a fixed dose combination product with [sofosbuvir] (tradename Harvoni) used for the treatment of chronic Hepatitis C. Approved in October 2014 by the FDA, Harvoni is indicated for the treatment of HCV genotypes 1, 4, 5, and 6 with or without [ribavirin] depending on the level of liver damage or cirrhosis. When combined together, ledipasvir and sofosbuvir as the combination product Harvoni has been shown to achieve a SVR between 93 and 99% after 12 weeks of treatment. Its use has also proven successful in the treatment of HCV in patients co-infected with HIV.
Science-backed ERA derivation by certified toxicologists with ex-agency experts -
Ledipasvir
Drug Overview
What is Ledipasvir?
Masuu Global provides end-to-end Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) support for pharmaceutical and healthcare products, covering Phase I environmental exposure assessment, Phase II environmental fate and effects assessment, data-gap analysis, testing strategy, laboratory coordination and final regulatory-ready reporting.
Request Your Assessment
Add this compound to your inquiry list and our team will follow up with full documentation, pricing, and licensing terms.
View Inquiry List →ERA Phase I Evaluation, ERA Phase II Evaluation, Consortium Testing Support (OECD Ecotoxicology Study)
Regulatory Framework
Assessment Methodology
Masuu Global follows a science-based, tiered and risk-based ERA methodology, aligned with applicable international regulatory requirements. For human medicinal products, our approach is primarily guided by the EMA Guideline EMEA/CHMP/SWP/4447/00 Rev. 1, effective 1 September 2024, together with relevant OECD Test Guidelines and regional regulatory requirements.
EMA — Environmental Risk Assessment
Assessment of potential environmental exposure associated with the use, manufacture and disposal of medicinal products, with a structured approach to determine whether further environmental assessment is required.
Phase I — Environmental Exposure Assessment
Initial screening to determine potential environmental exposure, covering PEC calculation, physicochemical properties, usage and dosage data, environmental entry pathways, and persistence and fate considerations.
Phase II — Environmental Fate & Effects Assessment
Where Phase I indicates further assessment is required, Phase II provides detailed evaluation of environmental fate, persistence and ecological effects — including biodegradation, bioaccumulation, aquatic toxicity, PNEC derivation and PEC/PNEC risk characterisation.
OECD & International Testing Principles
Where laboratory studies are required, testing strategies are designed with consideration of relevant OECD Test Guidelines, GLP expectations and applicable regulatory requirements.
Risk-Based Environmental Assessment
Integration of physicochemical data, environmental fate information, ecotoxicological data, existing literature, published studies, regulatory databases, usage data, and environmental monitoring data.
Weight-of-Evidence (WoE) Approach
A scientifically justified WoE approach integrates existing data and avoids unnecessary testing wherever scientifically and regulatorily justified.
ERA Assessment Pathway
Phase I → Phase II → Risk Characterization
Each phase builds on the prior tier — screening first, escalating only when the evidence demands it.
Environmental Exposure Assessment
Initial screening to determine whether the substance requires progression to Phase II.
- Product and substance information review
- Indication, dose and usage assessment
- PEC calculation and environmental exposure estimation
- Physicochemical property review
- Initial environmental risk screening
- Determination of Phase II requirement
Environmental Fate & Effects
Detailed evaluation when Phase I triggers further assessment.
- Biodegradation, hydrolysis & photolysis
- Adsorption/desorption behaviour
- Bioaccumulation potential
- Algal, Daphnia and fish toxicity
- Chronic ecotoxicity, where required
- PEC/PNEC risk characterisation
Laboratory Coordination & Study Execution
When regulatory testing is mandatory, Masuu coordinates with qualified GLP/appropriate testing laboratories and specialized scientific partners — giving clients a single point of contact across the full testing lifecycle.
Final ERA Report — Contents
- Executive summary
- Substance & product information
- Environmental exposure assessment
- Phase I evaluation
- Phase II assessment (where applicable)
- Environmental fate assessment
- Ecotoxicological assessment
- PEC/PNEC calculations
- Risk characterisation
- Data gap evaluation
- Testing rationale
- Risk mitigation considerations
- References and supporting scientific evidence
How We Work
Report Preparation Process
Every ERA follows a structured, tiered workflow designed to deliver scientifically defensible and regulator-ready assessments.
Comprehensive Data Collection
Product, substance, usage, physicochemical, toxicological, environmental and regulatory information collected and reviewed.
Phase I Environmental Screening
Environmental exposure assessment and determination of whether the assessment can conclude at Phase I or requires progression.
Phase II Evaluation
Detailed environmental fate and ecotoxicological assessment when Phase II is triggered.
Data Gap & Testing Strategy
Missing information identified and available alternatives evaluated before recommending additional testing.
Consortium Testing Support
Where testing is mandatory, Masuu coordinates with qualified testing partners through its Consortium Model.
Scientific & Regulatory Review
Integration and critical review of generated and existing data by experienced scientific and regulatory experts.
Final ERA Delivery
Comprehensive ERA report with transparent methodology, scientific rationale, calculations, conclusions and regulatory recommendations.
Ex-Agency Advantage
Why Masuu Global?
Our experienced regulatory and scientific experts bring a practical regulatory perspective — helping clients understand not only what data are required, but why they are required and how regulators may evaluate them.
Ready to request your assessment?
Add this compound to your inquiry list, or browse our full database of 7,000+ molecules.